Re: Thursday Hint

Date: 10 Aug 2024 01:07 (UTC)
forensicks: by <user name=mukha> (Impatient)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
what could be worse for the environment than a teakettle or a normal coffee maker?
get a little further away from the actual steaming devices. something that could be kept dry more easily

Re: Thursday Hint

Date: 10 Aug 2024 01:23 (UTC)
forensicks: by me (Or)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
you are at liberty to search the area if you are at a loss.

Re: Thursday Hint

Date: 10 Aug 2024 01:42 (UTC)
forensicks: by <user name=mukha> (Banter)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
is there something else you can bring me you think I might like?

[Walter is, of course, already jittery enough. He is not a coffee guy. Not even really a tea guy. What he really is at heart is a hot cocoa guy.

But at this setup with the multiple types of coffee makers and teakettle, in addition to the utensils, as for the drink materials proper? The hot cocoa is not stored in teabags nor raw materials nor in packets. There's a little multi-storied rack - where something flat placed underneath the items would easily go unnoticed unless someone stood right next to it and looked straight down. Where there something white, it would stand out against the black plastic.

For the single-serve coffee capsules.]

Re: Thursday Hint

Date: 10 Aug 2024 03:01 (UTC)
forensicks: by <user name=mukha> (Look)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
[...IS BAD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT!!!

Walter is just going to not answer the message since he believes it would be obtrusive at this moment what with the dramatic ellipsis and everything.

THERE IS A REAL IMPROVISED ENVELOPE MADE OUT OF PAPER AND TAPE. It is unmarked on the outside.

Open?]

Re: Thursday Hint

Date: 10 Aug 2024 03:36 (UTC)
forensicks: by me (Work)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
I assume from your hesitation that you're now reading the letter. I have to admit I was not in the kindest state of mind when I wrote it. You're free to roast me for my apparently incomprehensible punchline now.

[The letter inside, in familiar block-caps, reads:]

Dear Malcolm,

  1. You have permission to check your warden item every two (2) days during ports, once (1 time) per day during floods that affect the environment, and every five (5) days otherwise, to verify I'm not face down in a ditch somewhere.

  2. I will cooperate with up to thirty minutes of homework delegated to another warden per week, because despite your active detriment to my emotional state, I am taking graduation very seriously.

  3. You are still to check my ledger.


Not entirely respectfully,
YOUR INMATE!

P.S. The puzzles are only going to get harder from here.

Re: Thursday Hint

Date: 10 Aug 2024 21:43 (UTC)
forensicks: by me (Reminisce)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
[Walter had assumed Malcolm simply couldn't be denied permission to view Walter's device, not that he could directly read filtered content from his own. Wardens are so terrifying, and why can't most of them see that? Why is Malcolm knee deep in some types of gossip yet claiming to be above it?]

Other warden would devise the homework in that scenario.
Whatever.
This was a lot and I do appreciate that you did it even though you hated it.
Good night.

Re: Thursday Hint

Date: 20 Aug 2024 06:09 (UTC)
forensicks: by me (Guy)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
You can't say "I love sandwiches and thank you for the ham sandwich you made me, but also ham is meat and meat is murder", you know.

[It's pithy. It's something. He stares down at his communicator again, that Malcolm's frustrations continue pouring out of with almost physical force. Malcolm doesn't have any ideas from their months of prior rapport? Puzzles are a dialogue. What kind of special consultant could possibly not understand that? Did Walter really just romanticize something from the movies that never existed, that was just a shiny coat of polish on the carceral state?]

If I'm supposed to approve of your wardening for you to keep doing it but also be honest about any problems I have with you, then, yeah, I don't see how we can sustain a dialogue for now.
Have a nice night. I mean it.

Re: Thursday Hint

Date: 20 Aug 2024 15:13 (UTC)
forensicks: by me (Or)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
Well, I told you that you should lock sensitive posts to a small trusted group, and technically I wouldn't know if that had happened, but given your reaction to the suggestion I have to assume you didn't do that
I certainly can know that you've continued going out of your way to troll inmates and former inmates and their friends when the crisis isn't even happening anymore, as much as I told you not to do that either
"Don't tell me I could have poked a vampire in the eye" was a total freebie you also managed to whiff somehow
So. Yeah? These weren't coy little implications, dude.

Re: Thursday Hint

Date: 20 Aug 2024 19:00 (UTC)
forensicks: by <user name=mukha> (Impatient)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
No, you didn't tell me that! it's great news! really don't get why you told me MY suggestion to have a plan for who to call SUCKED

Bye. Cross your fingers for a flood where you find out your actual role.

Re: Thursday Hint

Date: 20 Aug 2024 19:24 (UTC)
forensicks: by <user name=mukha> (Ahoy)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
It's nice to have *proof* you didn't even care what I had to say about your thrilling little confidential investigations!

BYE.

Re: Thursday Hint

Date: 20 Aug 2024 19:49 (UTC)
forensicks: by me (Guy)
From: [personal profile] forensicks
[Seriously considering it, thanks!]
Page generated 10 Jun 2025 08:39
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios